When Elon Musk decided to buy Twitter, he enlisted the help (and financial assistance) of seven major banks to back his offer, ultimately securing loans of $13 billion. It seemed a good bet for the financial institutions at the time.
Musk, after all, had a history of success with businesses—and banks tend to sell that sort of debt, clearing their balance sheet and moving onto the next loan. Those banks, however, haven’t been able to sell the debt, in part because of the financial performance of Twitter, which is now known as X, and in part because of higher interest rates. And while interest payments have been made, the principal of the loans remains. That’s causing problems.
Musk paid $44 billion for the social media site in October 2022. As of March 31, the holding has lost an estimated 71.5% of its value—and the underperformance of those loans, reports the Wall Street Journal, is the worst the banking industry has seen since the real estate crisis of 2008.
In banking parlance, the loans are “hung,” meaning banks can’t offload them. Pitchbook data, cited by the Journal, says they’ve been hung longer than every other hung loan since 2008. They could, in some instances, be sold at a loss, but if Musk does ultimately repay them, the banks would not only recoup their initial investment, but interest payments that were set several points higher than what other investment companies are normally charged, due to the excessively high purchase price. (Annual interest payments total about $1.5 billion.)
Whether the loans will ultimately be paid off, of course, is still something of an X factor, if you will. Advertisers have reportedly fled the platform and don’t seem to be rushing back (though X has insisted many of those who left have returned). Musk, earlier this month, sued an advertising trade group, alleging they conspired to boycott X.
“We tried being nice for 2 years and got nothing but empty words. Now, it is war,” Musk said in a post on X.
While the election seems to be revitalizing some interest in X, with Musk interviewing Donald Trump recently to a seemingly significant number of listeners, the site has not found a way to monetize that interest, which will likely continue to act as a barrier for the banks to sell the loans.
That won’t help their standing in investment banking league tables, which ranks the market share of those sorts of financial institutions and is a key marketing tool for banks. The Journal notes that before the Twitter deal, Bank of America and Morgan Stanley led that list. In 2023 and 2024, JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs (who were not part of the deal) have been on top.
Some investment bankers have also seen their salaries or bonuses shrink, the Journal adds.
Banks aren’t the only ones facing financial exposure from the Twitter deal, of course. Several high-profile co-investors, including the Andreessen-Horowitz VC fund, Oracle founder Larry Ellison, Sequoia Capital, and Ron Baron, put up nearly $5 billion to help finance the deal. And Fidelity and Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund swapped their Twitter holdings for X stock rather than taking the payout investors were offered at the time of the sale.
(Fidelity’s valuation of that investment is one of the primary ways onlookers have been able to monitor Twitter’s financial fortunes in the Musk era.)
Musk’s own shares have lost an estimated $17 billion or so of their value.
Plenty of others have spoken out about nonfinancial harm they say they have suffered since the change in ownership as well. Musk’s decision to kill the company’s safety board has resulted in numerous complaints about harassment and the Anti-Defamation League has spoken out about rising hate speech on the social media platform. Most recently, J.K. Rowling and Elon Musk were named in a cyberbullying lawsuit by Algerian boxer Imane Khelif, who won the women’s welterweight division at the 2024 Paris Olympics, after sharing and posting comments attacking her gender eligibility.
Login to add comment
Other posts in this group
Imagine this: A new technology has arrived, drawing enormous public discussion. Among the questions is how it might be used in schools. Advocates call for its widespread adoption, saying it will r
When Russell Maichel started growing almonds, walnuts and pistachios in the 1980s, he didn’t own a cellphone. Now, a fully autonomous tractor drives through his expansive orchard, spraying p
DoorDash is expanding its portable benefits pilot program to certain gig workers in Georgia starting next year, the food-delivery giant tells Fast Company.
Dashers (which is wha
To get from 0 to 60 in Formula 1 engine design while competing against organizations with much more experience, Red Bull Ford Powertrains will need extra help (and, no, that boost won’t come in th
I am not what you would call a finely tuned athletic machine. I am, if anything, an outdated lawnmower engine held together by duct tape and rust. So when I was offered the opportunity to let AI h
It’s hard to remember now, as you scroll through a thicket of porn bots, anti-trans activists, and AI slop
