Four years ago, Donald Trump worked to cut off Americans’ access to TikTok. Now, as an actual January ban looms, he could be key to keeping the platform operating as usual in the U.S.
The president-elect, who joined TikTok in June to campaign, appears to have flipped the switch and has come out in support of the ByteDance-owned app in the past year. TikTok executives are also hopeful that the Trump administration will be friendly to the platform, The Information reported on Tuesday.
While only Congress can repeal the law that requires TikTok to divest from its parent company or be banned, Trump does have an arsenal of power at his disposal to keep the short-form video app active in the States. (He could also get some members of Congress to flip their votes, though that might prove more difficult.) But it’s not clear whether Trump will actually want to devote so much time and political goodwill to saving TikTok’s fate in the U.S.
“Given the fact that he originally attempted to ban it, his current opposition probably should be interpreted as more opportunistic than principled, and thus it is hard to tell how much priority he would assign to it,” Georgia Tech professor Milton Mueller writes in an email. It will also take time for Trump to replace people at the Justice Department who agree with him, Mueller adds.
If Trump were to aim to protect TikTok, he has options. The main mechanism to enforce the ban would involve civil penalties. Trump could direct the Justice Department to avoid penalizing the platform, internet service providers, and app stores for keeping the TikTok active, University of Minnesota professor Alan Rozenshtein tells Fast Company. That likely would only be a Band-Aid solution, potentially putting the app at risk in the 2028 election.
A more definitive approach could be for Trump to use the language of the law to his power. H.R. 815 prohibits distributing, maintaining, updating, or providing internet hosting services for an application controlled by a foreign adversary. But companies who have executed “a qualified divestiture determined by the President” aren’t impacted.
The language of the bill states that a qualified divestiture is a transaction that the president has determined “would result in the relevant foreign adversary controlled application no longer being controlled by a foreign adversary” and “precludes the establishment or maintenance of any operational relationship between the U.S. operations of the relevant application and any formerly affiliated entities that are controlled by a foreign adversary.” The key here is the president has determined.
“Could Trump just announce that ByteDance has done a qualified divestment of TikTok, even if ByteDance has not done a qualified divestment of TikTok?” Rozenshtein says. “It’s not clear that anybody would have standing to sue.”
Essentially, Trump’s say-so could create the legal reality that it is true. “Trump could defang it by simply declaring that TikTok is not a ‘foreign adversary controlled application,’” Mueller says. “I think he has the power to do that under the law.”
Login to add comment
Other posts in this group
A lawsuit accusing Elon Musk of rigging
Allow me to introduce you to my new favorite place on the internet: the Crumbl cookie subreddit.
The fan-run subreddit r/CrumblCookies, which boasts 77,000 members, recently went v
How do you remove children from the harms of social media? Politically the answer
Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT are already impacting the job market. A new study shows a 21% reduction in demand
Not many viral stars are able to translate their five minutes of fame into something tangible. But Haliey Welch, better known as the “Hawk Tuah girl,” has done just that.
Wel
In the hours after Donald Trump was declared the winner of the 2024 presidential election, a number of people took to social media
In a recent essay by Sam Altman, titled “The Intelligence Age,” he paints a picture for the future of AI. He states that with AI, “fixing the climate, estab
