Ashley Abramson first came across Sophie Cress in a cold pitch to her work email. Cress was asking to be an expert source for any stories Abramson was working on as a freelance reporter. “I’ve got over 8 years of experience and qualifications in Psychology and Couples & Family Therapy, and I’m enthusiastic about exploring potential collaborations, especially in the areas of love, relationships, or LGBTQIA+ topics,” Cress wrote.
She provided a list of links to articles where she’d supposedly been featured as an expert. Her email address, linked to a website reviewing sex toys, caught Abramson’s attention. Then, when Abramson insisted that she could only conduct interviews over phone or video call, Cress ghosted.
In a recent investigation for Allure, Abramson dug deeper into Cress’s background and alleged qualifications. Turns out (surprise!), she doesn’t actually exist and was created by the Latvia-based owner of sex-toy-review site, Sexual Alpha, to boost traffic and improve the site’s search rankings.
Dainis Graveris, owner of Sexual Alpha, did not respond to Abramson’s requests for comment but Abramson decided to investigate further. She started by searching for evidence of a “Sophie Cress” or similar names licensed in North Carolina or holding the degrees and certifications Cress claimed. She found none. Abramson also discovered that Cress’s headshot was a stock image, and the woman pictured was not named Sophie Cress.
Most journalists contacted by Cress simply took her at face value, allowing her operators to dupe outlets from the Metro to the Daily Mail. As Abramson writes, “Of course, anyone could always claim to be anyone, and AI programs make it easy to generate a chunk of text that seems, at least at first skim, like it was written by an expert in any field you can think of.”
This is a classic case of what is commonly known as internet slop: scammy, AI-generated content that’s becoming increasingly widespread online and beyond. Some studies have even found that people rated AI-generated content more favorably than content actually created by humans (or at least can’t tell the difference).
This rising tide of slop only serves to further clog the internet, which is already drowning in misinformation. “While this is unlikely to be some sort of election-altering Russian disinformation campaign,” Abramson concludes, “I wouldn’t say it’s a sign of a particularly bright future.”
Login to add comment
Other posts in this group
An unsubstantiated online theory has recently taken hold, claiming that family vloggers are fleeing Los Angeles to escape newly introduced California laws designed to protect children featured in
At a press conference in the Oval Office earlier this month, Elon Musk—a billionaire who is not, at least formally, the President of the United States—was asked how the Department of Government Ef
Last Energy, a nuclear upstart backed by an Elon Musk-linked venture capital fund, says it plans to construct 30 microreactors on a site in Texas to supply electricity to data centers across the s
Democratic lawmakers demanded answers from billionaire Elon Musk’s Department of Govern
For years, the creator economy has become increasingly accepted as the future of media. These days, makeup tutorials on TikTok could have the same impact for a brand as a multi-million dollar mark
For more than two decades, users have turned to search engines like Google, typed in a query, and received a familiar list of 10 blue links—the gateway to the wider web. Ranking high on that list,
