Many things irk people about the way modern companies operate. Workplace communication tools and so-called enterprise social media platforms are among the low-stakes but high-impact bugbears. Reading through the latest dull update from that guy in accounts who continually spams the work comms platform, or worrying about when and how to engage with a problematic post can cause plenty of stress.
Having to keep up with colleagues on a workplace communication platform annoys many. But new research suggests the much-maligned tools might actually serve a purpose—and can benefit workers and the businesses they work for.
Princeton University professor Manoel Horta Ribeiro led a study (together with two Microsoft researchers) that looked at how people use Microsoft’s Viva Engage—the service formerly known as Yammer. The team analyzed 99 companies’ in-staff interactions before and after they adopted Viva Engage.
The study found that using such tools increased the level of connectivity among staff by adding new ways to communicate, rather than shifting the existing ones online. It helped strengthen ties among workers, helped improve knowledge sharing and innovation within an organization, and was found to be more effective than email to allow people at different levels on the hierarchy of a business to communicate with one another.
That idea of bridging the gap between different staff levels was one of the key benefits of such tools, according to Ribeiro, who notes that the use of workplace communication and corporate social media tools like those studied highlight how low-level staffers are often the linchpins who keep a business running.
“We find that in corporate social media settings, low-level employees are actually more central in the network, meaning they are better positioned to spread communication throughout the company,” Ribeiro says.
Still, despite the benefits and boons encountered in the research, the perception remains that these tools can be the bane of people’s working lives, rather than a means of improving them.
So why do people hate platforms like Viva Engage? It’s not necessarily an issue with the tools themselves, but with the way people act on them.
“The thing that people hate about these platforms isn’t exclusive to enterprise social media. It’s the same thing that’s happening with LinkedIn or mainstream social platforms,” Ribeiro says. “People are gaming the system to become content creators rather than making meaningful connections.”
Login to add comment
Other posts in this group
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, passed i
When government officials accidentally included Jeffrey Goldberg, The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief, in a Signal group chat discussing U.S. military plans, all hell broke loose. The Atla
It really is mind-blowing how much incredible stuff we can do with images these days.
’Twasn’t long ago, after all, that advanced image adjustments required pricey desktop-computer software and s
Rasmus Hougaard is the founder and managing partner of Potential Project. In 2019 he was nominated by Thinkers50 as one of the eight most important leadership thinkers in the world. He writes for&
Almost 23 years ago, an employee at Apple described Steve Jobs to me as one of the world’s few “rock star CEOs.” At the time, I didn’t understand why anyone would talk about the head of a company
Millennials were told the 2008 recession was a “once in a generation” economic crisis. Almost two decades later, déjà vu has struck.
While the U.S. market rose following Pres
Meta is set to face off against the U.S. Federal Trade Commission on Monday in an antitrust trial that could force the social media giant to divest Instagram and WhatsApp.
The closely wa
