Do school phone bans actually work? A new study says not really

To ban or not to ban cellphones in school, that is the perennial question facing parents and educators across the country. 

A new study published in The Lancet lends credence to the latter camp, finding no evidence that restricting student access to cellphones improved either well-being or grades in reading and math. 

The study examined 30 schools in the U.K., 20 of which restricted cellphones in some capacity, 10 which did not. “In restrictive schools, phones were not allowed to be used during the school day for recreational purposes, and were required to be kept off inside bags, stored in lockers, kept in a pouch, handed into the school reception, or phones were not allowed onto the school premises altogether,” the authors wrote. “In permissive schools, phones were permitted to be used at any time or at certain times (e.g., breaks/lunch) and/or in certain zones (e.g., outside).” 

Contrary to popular belief, the researchers found no significant difference in the mental well-being of those students allowed to use their phones compared to those who were not. Importantly, that doesn’t mean cellphones don’t pose problems. The researchers found that the more time students spent on cellphones and social media, the lower their mental well-being. However, banning cellphones and eradicating social media isn’t the answer here.

While plenty of research shows the damage phones and social media can do to our mental health and dwindling attention spans, love them or hate them, cellphones aren’t going anywhere. Educators and administrators are better off putting their energy into helping teenagers navigate a world with cellphones and social media. Learning how to focus despite the pull of a phone in their back pocket will serve students better than coming up with ways to circumvent restrictive phone policies. 

“Reactionary hacks have been pushing the false narrative that social media and smartphones are leading to declining literacy and mental health problems. It’s false, and it’s simply the latest iteration of a long running freak out about the technology and media that young people are using,” writes journalist Taylor Lorenz in User Mag

While no one thinks students should be allowed to scroll on their phones all day in class, banning phones outright won’t magically make all problems disappear. If you’ve ever tried to ban a child from doing literally anything, you’ll understand why. 

https://www.fastcompany.com/91302876/do-school-phone-bans-actually-work-a-new-study-says-not-really?partner=rss&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss+fastcompany&utm_content=rss

Created 29d | Mar 20, 2025, 5:20:03 PM


Login to add comment

Other posts in this group

Netflix beats first quarter forecast, revealing it hasn’t been touched by Trump’s tariffs, yet

Netflix fared better than analysts anticipated during the first thr

Apr 18, 2025, 2:20:07 PM | Fast company - tech
Why are AI companies so bad at naming their models?

Six hours after OpenAI’s launch of GPT-4.1, Sam Altman was already apologizing. 

This time, it wasn’t about

Apr 18, 2025, 9:40:03 AM | Fast company - tech
TikTok is obsessed with this investor who bought 30 floors of a Chicago skyscraper

One of the more unique takes on the POV trend on TikTok: “POV: You bought a 100-year-old skyscraper . . . ”

For those unlikely to ever own a skyscraper themselves, TikTok’s Skyscraper Gu

Apr 18, 2025, 5:10:03 AM | Fast company - tech
Instagram launches ‘Blend’ to share personalized Reels with friends

When it comes to sharing Instagram Reels with friends, the process of three taps to get a Reel from A to B can feel surprisingly tedious. Now, Instagram has addressed that issue with its latest fe

Apr 17, 2025, 10:10:04 PM | Fast company - tech
New Jersey is suing Discord for allegedly violating child safety laws

New Jersey filed a lawsuit against Discord on Thursday, alleging that the social platform recklessly exposed children to “harassment, abuse, and sexual exploitation by predators who lurk on

Apr 17, 2025, 10:10:03 PM | Fast company - tech
Google just lost a major ad tech antitrust case. What happens next could rewire the web

Google has acted illegally to maintain a dominant position in online advertising, a federal judge ruled on Thursday. The tech giant’s “exclusionary conduct substantially harmed Google’s publisher

Apr 17, 2025, 7:40:06 PM | Fast company - tech
Nvidia watches its Trump overtures come to naught

Welcome to AI DecodedFast Company’s weekly newsletter that breaks down the most important news in the world of AI. You can sign up to receive this newsletter ever

Apr 17, 2025, 5:30:02 PM | Fast company - tech