There’s a cat-and-mouse game between those using generative AI chatbots to produce text undetected and those trying to catch them. Many believe they know the telltale signs—though as a journalist fond of the word “delve” and prone to em-dashes, I’m not so sure.
Researchers at four U.S. universities, however, have taken a more rigorous approach, identifying linguistic fingerprints that reveal which large language model (LLM) produced a given text.
“All these chatbots are coming out every day, and we interact with them, but we don’t really understand the differences between them,” says Mingjie Sun, a researcher at Carnegie Mellon University and lead author of the study, which was published in Cornell University’s preprint server arXiv. “By training a machine learning classifier to do this task, and by looking at the performance of that classifier, we can then assess the difference between different LLMs.”
Sun and his colleagues developed a machine learning model that analyzed the outputs of five popular LLMs, and was able to distinguish between them with 97.1% accuracy. Their machine learning model uncovered distinct verbal quirks unique to each LLM.
ChatGPT’s GPT-4o model, for instance, tends to use “utilize” more than other models. DeepSeek is partial to saying “certainly.” Google’s Gemini often prefaces its conclusions with the word “essentially,” while Anthropic’s Claude overuses phrases like “according to” and “according to the text” when citing its sources.
xAI’s Grok stands out as more discursive and didactic, often reminding users to “remember” key points while guiding them through arguments with “not only” and “but also.”
“The writing, the word choices, the formatting are all different,” says Yida Yin, a researcher at the University of California, Berkeley, and a coauthor of the paper.
These insights can help users select the best model for specific writing tasks—or aid those trying to catch AI-generated text masquerading as human work. So, remember: according to this study, if a model utilizes certain words, it’s certainly possible to identify it.
Connectez-vous pour ajouter un commentaire
Autres messages de ce groupe
With their drab gray suits and their Buddy Holly glasses, the so-called traitorous eight don’t look like revolutionaries. Given n
Morocco‘s social security agency said troves of data were stolen from its systems in a cyberattack this week that resulted in personal informatio
Welcome to AI Decoded, Fast Company’s weekly newsletter that breaks down the most important news in the world of AI. You can sign up to receive this newsletter ever
Thomas Shedd, who directs the General Services Administration’s vaunted tech group, Technology
Tech giant Apple chartered cargo flights to ferry 600 tons of iPhone
As the Trump administration
