Big ISPs finally gave up on blocking California’s landmark network neutrality law

On Thursday, major internet service providers (AT&T, Verizon, Comcast, et al.) dropped a lawsuit challenging a California law requiring broadband networks to treat traffic and content from all websites and services equally. The ISPs’ legal challenge had already lost three times in California Federal courts. Network neutrality proponents are calling the abandonment of the suit a huge win for digital rights and the open web. The ISP trade groups revealed their decision in a brief filed Wednesday in the Federal District Court of California, Eastern District. “When they lost last time around . . . they really lost,” says Evan Greer of the grassroots tech-rights group Fight for the Future, which has long advocated for net neutrality but was not directly involved in the case. “The court all but said that if you take this case to the Supreme Court you will lose.” The ISPs last year asked the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California for an injunction to block the California law, but the court declined. The trade groups then appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, but the court only reaffirmed the lower court’s decision. Next, the ISP groups asked the appeals court for an en banc hearing (in which all the court’s justices are present). The appeals court refused to vote on the case in a decision handed down April 22. The trade groups’ withdrawal notice comes roughly two weeks later. “They may have just been reading the writing on the wall that there is a strong case for net neutrality, and then decided not to waste more money but to cut their losses,” Greer says. California lawmakers began working on the state’s own network neutrality law after the Trump administration’s FCC (chaired by former Verizon lawyer Ajit Pai) in 2017 reversed an earlier ruling that required carriers to treat web traffic and content from all websites and services equally. California’s law, eventually named SB 822, restored those requirements for ISPs doing business within the state. The law passed in 2018 (despite fierce lobbying by the ISPs) but was not enforced while the legal wrangling continued in the courts. “While California has been free to enforce its net neutrality law for over a year, today removes any doubt that the state has the right to protect its economy and democratic discourse from the whims of large phone and cable companies,” Stanford Law professor Barbara van Schewick, a proponent of the SB 822, wrote in a blog post. The trade groups representing the ISPs released a statement Wednesday in which they seem to rail against state-level net neutrality laws, not against the need for network neutrality protections in general. “Broadband providers are united in support of an open internet and committed to delivering the content and services consumers demand as they’ve continued to demonstrate through their marketplace practices,” the trade groups wrote in the joint statement. “A common framework protecting the open internet is the right path forward for consumers, innovation, and economic growth. We commit to work with Congress and the FCC to develop a federal approach that resolves these important issues.” California remains the only state to pass a law that restores all of the net neutrality protections that the FCC eliminated in 2017. Lawmakers in Washington, D.C., see it as a “model” bill and have closely watched its fate in the courts. The withdrawal of the ISPs’ lawsuit may make SB 822 an even stronger model for a federal law if Congress decides to advance one. It’s far more likely that a Democratically controlled FCC would make a ruling to reinstate the FCC network neutrality protections. But in order to do that, the agency must have all of its commissioner chairs filled—and one remains vacant because the Senate has slow-walked the confirmation of Democrat Gigi Sohn. As of now, the FCC is deadlocked on party lines at 2-2. “The Senate needs to get their act together,” Greer says. As the delay continues, the ISP lobby groups and proxies are ramping up efforts to spread uncertainty and doubt among senators about the implications of Sohn’s confirmation.

https://www.fastcompany.com/90749582/big-isps-finally-gave-up-on-blocking-californias-landmark-network-neutrality-law?partner=rss&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss+fastcompany&utm_content=rss

Creato 3y | 6 mag 2022, 08:21:12


Accedi per aggiungere un commento

Altri post in questo gruppo

In his first 100 days, Trump’s tariffs are already threatening the AI boom

When Donald Trump returned to the White House in 2025, many in the tech world hoped his promises to champion artificial intelligence and cut regulation would outweigh the risks of his famously vol

29 apr 2025, 16:50:07 | Fast company - tech
How learning like a gamer helped this high-school dropout succeed

There are so many ways to die. You could fall off a cliff. A monk could light you on fire. A bat the size of a yacht could kick your head in. You’ve only just begun the game, and yet here you are,

29 apr 2025, 12:20:08 | Fast company - tech
Renate Nyborg’s Meeno wants to become the Duolingo of dating

Former Tinder CEO Renate Nyborg launched Meeno less than two years ago with the intention of it being an AI chatbot that help

29 apr 2025, 12:20:07 | Fast company - tech
How Big Tech’s Faustian bargain with Trump backfired

The most indelible image from Donald Trump’s inauguration in January is not the image of the president taking the oath of office without his hand on the Bible. It is not the image of the First Lad

29 apr 2025, 12:20:06 | Fast company - tech
Turns out AI is really bad at picking up on social cues

Ernest Hemingway had an influential theory about fiction that might explain a lot about a p

29 apr 2025, 12:20:04 | Fast company - tech
Signal is the unlikely star of Trump’s first 100 days

The first 100 days of Trump’s second presidential term have included a surprising player that doesn’t seem likely to go away anytime soon: Signal.

The encrypted messaging pl

29 apr 2025, 09:50:13 | Fast company - tech