Would you pay $4,000 to solve your streaming movie problems?

Let’s say you were spending tens of thousands of dollars to build yourself a fancy home theater. How would you go about actually watching movies in it?

While you could always set up a Roku or Apple TV box to stream on, they’re not going to feel all that theatrical. Most streaming devices are too bogged down with banner ads and obnoxious upsells, and the streaming services themselves compromise on audiovisual quality for the sake of smoother streaming. Maybe what you actually need is a device that explicitly caters to videophiles with obsessively-manicured home theater setups.

That’s what Kaleidescape has been trying to accomplish for the past two decades. This small company—with roughly 54 employees across its Mountain View headquarters and engineering offices in Waterloo—has made a name for itself among A/V diehards with its eye-poppingly expensive video players, which combine the convenience of digital delivery with Blu-ray quality. Just as notable, though, is its unfussy movie player software, which clears away all the cruft of modern streaming platforms to focus on the films themselves.

“What we’re aiming at is trying to get you to an experience that is as close to the director’s intent as you possibly can get,” says Tayloe Stansbury, Kaleidescape’s CEO and chairman.

The cost of near-cinema quality doesn’t come cheap, at $4,000 for Kaleidescape’s entry-level Strato V Movie Player. But believe it or not, this is the start of Kaleidescape’s attempt to move down-market, having previously charged upwards of $10,000 for its hardware (plus the cost to purchase movies at about $20 apiece).

Stansbury, a former Intuit CTO who took the helm at Kaleidescape after getting hooked on the system himself, says he’s on a mission to revitalize the company and reach new audiences after years of stagnant product development. But if that’s the goal, Kaleidescape may eventually need to reckon with the streaming business models it’s spent all these years rejecting.

Hi-fi movies

Unlike most TV boxes you can buy today, Kaleidescape does not work with any streaming services or come with a free catalog of ad-supported content. After setting up the Strato V, you are presented with a sparse menu system for downloading movies—either for purchase or rental—and watching them.

And “downloading” is the correct term, as Kaleidescape does not believe in the vagaries of streaming. Each film takes about 10 minutes to acquire over a gigabit wired ethernet connection—no Wi-Fi allowed—at which point it will play back even if the system’s offline. No other streaming platform supports that unless you’re on a mobile device.

“When you play it, it’s perfect every single time,” Stansbury says.

But the main differentiator is the quality of the content itself. While Kaleidescape gets the same source files from studios as every other digital movie store, it’s not in the business of seeing how much compression it can get away with. The company encodes video files at an average 65 Mbps, versus 12 Mbps to 30 Mbps for other services according to FlatpanelsHD, and it delivers lossless audio at 6 Mbps, matching or exceeding the quality of 4K Blu-ray discs with Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos.

Kaleidescape is also obsessive about finding issues in its video files through human review, and will either request updates from the studio or apply its own transcoding coding changes to address them. (Stansbury says the company’s record number of revisions for a single film is 92.)

“It doesn’t matter if you’re on an inexpensive TV with no soundbar, or you’re in a million dollar theater, it will look and sound better when you feed it with high fidelity content,” he says.

The result is sort of like listening to a CD instead of a lossy MP3 file: There are folks who will insist the difference is night and day, others who will never notice, and a third group that feels better on some gut level about having a pristine version either way.

I probably fall into the third category. Kaleidescape loaned a Strato V to review for this story, and I made my eyes numb looking for barely-perceptible differences between Kaleidescape’s films and their 4K HDR streaming counterparts. On my Samsung QD-OLED TV, the colors in Mad Max: Fury Road seemed more natural than the on-demand version from Amazon, and maybe the audio was a little clearer, but was I just fooling myself? Hard to say.

There was, however, one obvious improvement: Kaleidescape does a better job with subtitles. Its version of Parasite, for instance, used a much nicer font with no black background like Netflix’s version, and certain translated phrases made more sense (like “check WhatsApp” instead of “check the messenger”).

Even more noticeable, at least to me as a longtime reviewer of streaming players, was the straightforward nature of Kaleidescape’s interface, which in a way it scratches the same simplistic itch as an iPod for music. There’s a row of recommended movie purchases at the top, a row of downloaded movies underneath, additional rows for movies-in-progress and favorites, and that’s it. The absence of distraction stands in sharp contrast to every modern streaming platform.

Sometimes the sparseness can be vexing. There’s no voice search—at least not without dictating into Kaleidescape’s smartphone remote app—and the infrared remote requires line-of-sight to the box. But the system has some niceties as well, like the collection of popular scenes you can jump to in each film and the integration with Lutron, which allows for home automation in response to certain video queues, such as raising the lights when the credits start rolling.

Those kinds of experiences have made Kaleidescape a favorite among A/V installers, says John Sciacca, who covered Kaleidescape extensively as a contributing editor for Sound & Vision and works as a partner at an installer in South Carolina.

“Everybody wants it,” Sciacca says. “You might not want to pay for it, but you would love to own it. And there’s not too many things out there that deliver that kind of an experience.”

Cheating death

Kaleidescape didn’t start off in the movie download business. Its first product, which launched in 2003, was a $30,000 video server that made digital copies of users’ DVDs and played them all through single menu system.

Bloggers mocked the concept. (“If that’s not worth selling a kidney, we don’t know what is,” Engadget‘s Paul Miller wrote in 2006.) But Kaleidescape won over home theater enthusiasts, who marveled at how it made sense of their DVD collections. It even skipped the FBI warnings and other annoyances that DVD viewers had to sit through.

“The experience was just better,” says Josh Goldman, a longtime owner who runs the independent Kaleidescape Owners Forum. “You could instantly sort and find other movies you wanted. You could find related movies to the one you just liked. You couldn’t really do that with a rack of DVDs in their cases.”

But there was a problem: The DVD Copy Control Association took issue with Kaleidescape’s digital copies, which had no way of ensuring that users still owned their original DVDs and weren’t sharing them. The group sued Kaleidescape in 2005 and eventually prevailed after seven years of court battles. A settlement in 2014 allowed existing customers to keep using their systems, but barred Kaleidescape from selling any new systems with DVD ripping capabilities.

The lawsuit took its toll on Kaleidescape, which also ran into manufacturing problems developing a new Blu-ray-based product around the same time. In 2016, the company almost shut down, with then-CEO Cheena Srinivasan blaming the lawsuit for “millions of dollars in legal fees and years of lost focus” before it secured an equity funding round to stay alive.

Sciacca says the company’s brush with death helped accelerate its pivot toward digital distribution, which had began several years earlier. With new funding and no more legal clouds, it was able to make more deals with movie studios.

“Kaleidescape was founded on disc-based importing,” he says. “The lawsuit paved the way for Kaleidescape 2.0, but also kind of put an end to Kaleidescape 1.0.”

Making moves

Stansbury wound up in control of Kaleidescape for somewhat selfish reasons.

He acquired his first system in 2011, on the recommendation of an A/V dealer who was overhauling his home theater. Although he fell in love with the product, he wound up getting frustrated with some gaps in the movie catalog and had some ideas on how to revamp the product line. He reached out to Kaleidescape, offering to make introductions with his contacts in Hollywood, which led to him becoming an investor in the company before taking the helm outright in 2020.

“I was annoyed with some decisions that were made about product roadmaps, and I called them up to grump about those,” he says. “And eventually that developed into meeting the chairman and being asked to take over leadership of the company.”

Stansbury points to a few things Kaleidescape has done since then. Beyond shipping the Strato V, the company has released new server products with higher storage capacities, and it’s made a foray into B2B with a server product for movie theaters. The idea is that exhibitors can use Kaleidescape for quick, flexible access to back-catalog films at high quality instead of arranging for delivery from studios.

“What we’ve done is cranked out a whole new bunch of products,” Stansbury says. “We’ve got a whole bunch of new products I won’t talk to you about that are in the pipeline for the future, and we’ve also been steadily growing revenue and improving the financial picture for the company as well.”

Sciacca, who was close with former CEO Cheena Srinivasan, says that while Srinivasan was more engineering-focused, Stansbury brings more of a business sensibility. “Tayloe, the new CEO, I think he came in with different business ideas, and infusion of capital, and, you know, ‘Fortune 500-think’ on how to run a company,” he says. (Kaleidescape declined to make its former leadership available for interviews.)

Sticking to the past

Back in 2016, when Kaleidescape narrowly avoided shutting down, Sciacca wrote a story for Sound & Vision wondering if home media server products could survive in the streaming age. Kaleidescape had outlasted a wave of competitors—Xperinet MIRV, Sunfire Theater Grand Media Player, Leviton LEAPS, among others—but could never truly compete with streaming’s convenience.

He’s more optimistic now, but believes the price needs to come down further. “At the end of the day, if you if you want to buy and watch movies, there’s a lot of cheaper ways to do it,” he says.

But going further down-market won’t be easy. Kaleidescape’s movie prices—$25 for new-release films, $8 for a typical rental—is not much higher than other streaming platforms. Stansbury says Kaleidescape customers are surprisingly sensitive about movie prices, so it builds the cost of its ongoing engineering work into the hardware. He’s unsure whether Kaleidescape could adopt a subscription model that brings in ongoing revenue.

“Financially, I’d love that, but that doesn’t seem to be where our customers’ heads are at,” he says. “They tend to be more of an ownership mindset.”

Even so, Josh Goldman, who runs the Kaleidescape Owner’s Forum, believes the company should move to a cloud-based system. The Strato V can only store 10 movies at a time, so customers have to either constantly re-download films or tack on another server, starting at $5,000. While his forum is more active now than it once was, he believes the number of people willing to install expensive server systems in their home is shrinking, and home internet speeds are now fast enough to keep up with Kaleidescape’s bitrates.

“That’s got to be the ultimate survival plan for the company to maintain and deliver the best movie shopping, delivery, and playback experience,” he says. “It can’t be about storage in the home. It’s obviously got to go away.”

Beyond just chasing lower prices, Kaleidescape faces a more existential challenge: Increasingly the content people want to watch at home can’t be bought on digital video stores. If you want to watch Severance, you need Apple TV+. If you want to watch Squid Game, you need Netflix. Those shows aren’t available on Kaleidescape at all.

Stansbury says he’s had conversations with streamers about potentially selling high-fidelity versions of their streaming exclusives. And in some cases, that content is co-developed with a traditional studio, in which case it does eventually become available to purchase a year or two after release.

But he also points out that Kaleidescape’s focus on movies is becoming a bigger advantage as the DVD and Blu-ray business dry up. Best Buy, Walmart, and Target have all stopped selling physical media, and fewer movies are coming out on disc in the first place. Major streaming platforms, meanwhile, don’t even offer Blu-ray quality as an option.

“The only way to get that is through Kaleidescape, so it does put us in an increasingly unique position,” Stansbury says.

So maybe Kaleidescape doesn’t need to adapt to the streaming world, because it’s survived this long playing a different game entirely. Whatever happens next, enthusiasts like Goldman aren’t betting against it.

“Our laser disc player is gone, our VCRs are gone, even our TiVo is gone,” he says. “Everything has changed, but Kaleidescape, remarkably, has been a consistent part of our home video watching for 20 years, which really is amazing.”

https://www.fastcompany.com/91302903/would-you-pay-4000-to-solve-your-streaming-movie-problems?partner=rss&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss+fastcompany&utm_content=rss