As the world watches Hamas’ brutal attack on Israel unfold, American eyes in the sky are limited in what they can show because of a 1997 law.
How we got here
Under the Kyl-Bingaman Amendment (KBA), which passed in the 1997 NDAA, American companies can’t release imagery of Israel that’s at a higher resolution than what’s distributed by non-U.S. companies. For decades, that meant American companies could only disseminate 2m-resolution imagery of Israel.
In July 2020, the Commerce Department found that non-U.S. commercial entities were collecting and distributing higher resolution images, so they increased the allowable resolution to 40 cm. More recently in August, NOAA lifted all resolution restrictions—except for over Israel, Joe Morrison, Umbra’s VP of commercial product, told Payload.
“Even if you’re taking imagery of Gaza or Lebanon or Egypt, if a corner of the image includes Israel, we treat that image as if KBA applies to the whole scene,” Morrison said. “There’s absolutely no upside to testing the limits of this thing. Nobody is going to push the limit.”
Compare and contrast
While some images have been released by Planet, Maxar, and Satellogic that are within the 40-cm resolution standard, it’s a stark contrast to the war in Ukraine, where satellite images of tanks assembling along the border flooded the news in the days leading up to the conflict.
“Satellite images over a small, condensed region like Israel and the Gaza Strip present different dynamics than we have seen in a larger, more spread out region like Ukraine and Russia,” a Planet spokesperson told Payload in a statement.
Still, Morrison suggested a less technical reason why imagery may not be as abundant yet.
“It’s hard to release images of active conflict because it’s hard to predict unintended consequences,” he said. “It’s much safer to release data that is a little stale if you release anything at all.”
What’s next
It’s unclear if this conflict will lead to the law being changed.
- If a foreign company published imagery of Israel with 30 cm resolution, for example, American industry could go to NOAA and ask for the standard to be changed again, Morrison said.
- Though it would take action from Congress, Morrison speculated that rules could also end up changing if the law prevented the U.S. from helping allies.
“Everybody wants the most rational outcome,” he said. “KBA is intended to protect the interests of Israel. If it’s not doing that, maybe this event leads to a change.”
This story originally appeared on Payload and is republished here with permission.
Autentifică-te pentru a adăuga comentarii
Alte posturi din acest grup
Remember when Netflix cost $9 per month and The New York Times website was free? Well, the days of online media feeling like a bargain are long gone. Today, it’s become a costly
Welcome to the world of social media mind control. By amplifying free speech with fake speech, you can numb the brain into believing just about anything. Surrender your blissful ignorance and swall
Few periods in modern history have been as unsettled and uncertain as the one that we are living through now. The established geopolitical order is facing its greatest challenges in dec
Substack and Patreon are vying to become creators’ primary revenue stream.
For most influencers, payouts from platforms like Meta or Google aren’t enough to build a sustainable career. R
The European Commission is coming for “SkinnyTok.”
EU regulators are investigating a recent wave of social media videos that promote extreme thinness and “tough-love” weight loss advice,
