Is Elon Musk a government employee? Here’s why it matters

Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, is CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, but when it comes to his work with the federal government, his status is a lot less clear. While he’s firmly in charge of Donald Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), whether he will actually become a government employee is still an unanswered question.

That might seem like a technicality. Musk has Trump’s ear and the two have basically been inseparable for months now. But as Trump’s second term gets underway and DOGE begins to have actual power in the administration, whether or not Musk is named a “special government employee” could have some real impacts—as well as lead to some legal challenges, some of which have already been filed.

Since DOGE is not an official government department, Musk did not have to go through any sort of vetting or confirmation process. The department will report to the White House chief of staff Susie Wiles via an administrator (though it’s unclear if Musk will fill that role), according to the executive order establishing it. DOGE will actually be a reorganization (and renaming) of an existing division called the United States Digital Service, which was established in August 2014 by President Barack Obama. 

Elon Musk was initially expected to have an office in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, which is part of the White House complex, but not part of the West Wing. Now, according to a report in the New York Times, Musk might be moving into the same building as Trump, giving him even more access to the executive office. 

Musk’s formal employment status will impact what sort of restrictions he could face. (Fast Company reached out to the White House inquiring about Musk’s employee designation and will update this story if we receive a reply.) 

If Musk becomes a special government employee, he would face conflict-of-interest restrictions that could impact several of his businesses, which have several billion dollars in government contracts. He also would have to file financial disclosure forms, unless he chose to take no salary (something he has indicated he is open to).

Also, with special government employee status, Musk would be restricted by federal ethics laws, which make it illegal for any government employees to participate in official matters in which they, their families, or their organizations have a financial interest. (Trump, though, could give Musk a written waiver from those, according to a report in the Times.)

But remaining a private citizen doing work for the government might not align with Musk’s goals, either. In doing so, he would run into a rule: the Federal Advisory Committee Act. This law requires advisory committees to make committee meetings open to the public, along with all documents and materials submitted to or produced by the department. As a special government employee, DOGE would have the option of conducting some business in full view of the public and some in a more private manner.

Elon Musk has said DOGE will work with “full transparency.” DOGE, so far, has been largely operating in secret, aside from occasional posts on X.

Of course, if opponents have their way, the whole question of Musk’s status as a special government employee could be moot. Minutes after Trump was sworn in on Monday, a lawsuit was filed by National Security Counselors, a public interest law firm, alleging DOGE violated federal transparency laws tied to the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

DOGE, the suit alleges, has failed to allow the public to attend meetings, keep minutes, file a charter with Congress, and more, as Musk and crew began looking for potential cuts shortly after the election was called. Ideas for cuts, the Washington Post reports, were exchanged via encrypted messages on the Signal app.

That suit is just one of four filed against DOGE on Monday. They hope to shut down the department until it begins to comply with the transparency rules. 

https://www.fastcompany.com/91264793/is-elon-musk-a-government-employee-why-it-matters?partner=rss&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss+fastcompany&utm_content=rss

Creată 2d | 22 ian. 2025, 00:50:07


Autentifică-te pentru a adăuga comentarii

Alte posturi din acest grup

What to do when you can’t escape your old boss on social media

There are certain social media rules we can all agree on: Ghosting a conversation is impolite, and replying “k” to a text is the equivalent of a backhand slap (violent, wrong, and rude). But what

23 ian. 2025, 11:40:05 | Fast company - tech
‘The Brutalist’ used AI voice editing. Is that such a crime?

The Brutalist, a three-and-a-half-hour awards favorite, is a film about human creativity. Ironically, its biggest scandal surrounds artificial intelligence.

Brady Corbet’s epic

23 ian. 2025, 11:40:05 | Fast company - tech
Trump rescinds Biden’s executive order on AI safety, as promised

Hours after returning to the White House, President Donald Trump made a symbolic mark on the 

22 ian. 2025, 21:50:07 | Fast company - tech
OpenAI says India court can’t hear case on alleged copyright breach

OpenAI has told an Indian court that any order to remove training data powering its C

22 ian. 2025, 21:50:06 | Fast company - tech
NFL tells New England Patriots it can’t be on Bluesky

The NFL directed the New England Patriots to delete its Bluesky account, the team’s VP of content Fred Kirsch said on a podcast.

Kirsch said on a January 16 episode of Patriot

22 ian. 2025, 21:50:05 | Fast company - tech
Trump pardons Silk Road creator Ross Ulbricht

President Donald Trump pardoned Ross Ulbricht, the creator of the drug marketplace

22 ian. 2025, 21:50:05 | Fast company - tech
Wisconsin man charged with arson of congressman’s office over TikTok ban

Prosecutors charged a Wisconsin man who allegedly told police he tried to burn down a congressman’s office because he was upset with the 

22 ian. 2025, 21:50:04 | Fast company - tech