Twitter filed a lawsuit against Elon Musk on Tuesday, after Musk decided to back out of a $44 billion takeover bid. Musk’s termination of the Merger Agreement between himself and the social media platform late last week—which was hardly unexpected—centered around what Musk’s lawyers called “false and misleading representations” about the platform’s user data and apparent bot issues.
Twitter, however, sued Musk to enforce the deal in a Delaware Chancery Court, which, as The Washington Post reports, operates differently than most other courts in the U.S. Twitter also filed a motion to expedite proceedings, requesting a four-day trial to be held in September.
“Musk refuses to honor his obligations to Twitter and its stockholders because the deal he signed no longer serves his personal interests. Having mounted a public spectacle to put Twitter in play, and having proposed and then signed a seller-friendly merger agreement, Musk apparently believes that he — unlike every other party subject to Delaware contract law — is free to change his mind, trash the company, disrupt its operations, destroy stockholder value, and walk away,” Twitter’s complaint reads. “Twitter brings this action to enjoin Musk from further breaches, to compel Musk to fulfill his legal obligations, and to compel consummation of the merger upon satisfaction of the few outstanding conditions.”
Musk’s initial reaction, via Twitter: “Oh the irony lol.”
Twitter’s lawsuit is the latest in an ongoing drama between the company and Musk, which seemingly started in March when Musk put out feelers about joining Twitter’s board or taking it private. In early April, he purchased a 9.4% stake in Twitter, and on April 25, Twitter agreed to be acquired for $44 billion, or $54.20 per share.
Since then, Twitter shares have fallen in value, along with most of the market. As of the market close on Tuesday, Twitter shares were trading for around $34. As a result, if Musk were to go through with the acquisition, he could stand to take a financial hit.
What’s next? It’s hard to say—Twitter could win, which would effectively force the deal to go through, or Musk could be allowed to walk away. A settlement is also possible, such as one that lowers the purchase price. But legal experts say that Twitter likely has the upper hand, according to a recent report from The Wall Street Journal. The big question, however, is this: If the court rules for Twitter, is there any way to force Musk to actually buy it?
We may find out.
Войдите, чтобы добавить комментарий
Другие сообщения в этой группе
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d127c/d127c1c6188bf1d76262f6302eefb25e69914f19" alt="Curious about DeepSeek but worried about privacy? These apps let you use an LLM without the internet"
Most of us are used to using internet chatbots like ChatGPT and
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d449/5d4491052d0b38f39f32de60591c5c9130ba3295" alt="Intel’s anticipated $28 billion chip factories in Ohio are delayed until 2030"
Intel‘s promised $28 billion chip fabrication plants in Ohio are facing further delays, with the first factory in New Albany expected
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db710/db7109b541d7c5cc33c2d8c3d7762850e44df7bf" alt="Tired of overdramatic TikTok food influencers? Professional critics are too"
TikTok and Instagram are flooded with reels of food influencers hyping already viral restaurants or bringing hundreds of thousands of eyes to hidden gems. With sauce-stained lips, exaggerated chew
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6dddc/6dddc3bafecc8115c4b77a9d8d2f9c4e7a5ac31b" alt="The internet has suspicions about family vloggers fleeing California. Here’s why"
An unsubstantiated online theory has recently taken hold, claiming that family vloggers are fleeing Los Angeles to escape newly introduced California laws designed to protect children featured in
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4304c/4304c7a4cb5290f6ff29fcd8c61f2e2d51085ac8" alt="DOGE isn’t Silicon Valley innovation—it’s just a sloppy rebrand of free-market dogma"
At a press conference in the Oval Office earlier this month, Elon Musk—a billionaire who is not, at least formally, the President of the United States—was asked how the Department of Government Ef
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e8e1/0e8e12bf180ae656e845ab65879b0c9d7772f68f" alt="Next-gen nuclear startup plans 30 reactors to fuel Texas data centers"
Last Energy, a nuclear upstart backed by an Elon Musk-linked venture capital fund, says it plans to construct 30 microreactors on a site in Texas to supply electricity to data centers across the s
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9f5f/e9f5f23833acc562b39cfd07a1e7cc2e86405e2a" alt="Who at DOGE has access to U.S. intelligence secrets? Democrats are demanding answers"
Democratic lawmakers demanded answers from billionaire Elon Musk’s Department of Govern