Google’s Privacy Sandbox creates an uneven playing field, small ad-tech firms say

Smaller ad-tech firms are raising competition concerns over Google’s long-brewing cookies alternative, Privacy Sandbox, at a time when the internet giant’s digital ads business is already under U.S. and UK scrutiny.

The U.S. and UK regulators suspect that Privacy Sandbox, which has been in the making for five years, could give Google too much control over the digital advertising market, harming competition.

Google’s dominance through Chrome and Android platforms, which command the lion’s share of internet users, makes adapting to Privacy Sandbox a critical necessity for ad-tech firms.

However, the investigations and potential technology development delays are hurting smaller ad-tech firms, as the burgeoning costs due to adoption delays for Privacy Sandbox will put them at a disadvantage against well-heeled rivals.

At least 11 ad executives told Reuters that Privacy Sandbox may create an uneven playing field that favors larger firms with greater funding and technical prowess.

Privacy Sandbox is a set of technologies that aims to enhance user privacy by anonymizing data, implementing stricter access controls, and targeting groups of users rather than individuals. It was developed to replace cookies, which are used for tracking and targeting individual users.

Google’s initial plan to phase out third-party cookies in Chrome and replace them with the Privacy Sandbox met with significant opposition from ad-tech companies and antitrust regulators, compelling the search giant to backtrack.

“We’ve designed and implemented the Privacy Sandbox to support a competitive and thriving marketplace,” the internet giant said, adding that Google has seen the ad industry investing in solutions to move away from third-party cookies.

An uneven playing field

“Smaller ad-tech companies simply do not have the engineering teams or financial resources to effectively build out functional Privacy Sandbox platforms that can be used at scale – they are at a complete disadvantage,” said Drew Stein, CEO of ad-tech firm Audigent.

The firms face greater financial risk as Privacy Sandbox’s uncertain timeline extends development costs beyond the initial $5 million to $10 million investment they had expected.

Stein said Audigent, which helps advertisers improve ad targeting and publishers boost ad revenue, has invested “several million dollars” into Privacy Sandbox over the past few years, representing a substantial investment considering its annual revenue of about $150 million.

Meanwhile, large firms such as Raptive and Index Exchange have invested less than 3% of their revenue towards engineering resources for Privacy Sandbox, according to sources familiar with the matter.

“Having a whole developers’ team, spending multiple years on a project is a huge investment for a small-medium sized company,” said Luckey Harpley, staff product manager at Remerge.

Experts said while larger ad-tech firms such as Taboola and Index Exchange might be less impacted by the introduction of the new technologies, regulatory efforts to ensure fair competition will be crucial in preventing Google from further consolidating its dominant position.

“I don’t think Google’s going to wind up in the sort of kingpin position that some people might say it will,” said Dennis Buchheim, CTO at ThinkMedium and former CEO of IAB Tech Lab.

“Don’t think it’s going to be allowed.”

—Akash Sriram and Harshita Mary Varghese, Reuters

Additional reporting by Kenrick Cai in San Francisco.

https://www.fastcompany.com/91186852/google-privacy-sandbox-uneven-playing-field-ad-tech-firms?partner=rss&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss+fastcompany&utm_content=rss

Created 5mo | Sep 9, 2024, 7:30:08 PM


Login to add comment

Other posts in this group

Did you show ‘negative sentiment’ for insurance companies after the UHC CEO shooting? Police were watching

When news broke that the United Healthcare CEO was shot in broad daylight early last month, outrage erupted online. But it wasn’t aimed at the assassin. Instead, it was directed at the broken U.S.

Jan 25, 2025, 12:50:02 AM | Fast company - tech
How an AI-generated ‘expert’ sank into media deadlines

Ashley Abramson first came across Sophie Cress in a cold pitch to her work email. Cress was asking to be an expert source for any stories Abramson was working on as a freelance reporter. “I’ve got

Jan 24, 2025, 10:30:03 PM | Fast company - tech
Meta’s Threads is finally getting ads

Threads, Meta’s X and Bluesky rival, is testing ads with certain brands in the United States and Japan, the company said Friday.

“We know there will be plenty of feedback abo

Jan 24, 2025, 8:10:07 PM | Fast company - tech
How the broligarchy is imitating Trump in more ways than one

Sooner or later, the politicians who most admire Donald Trump begin to emulate him. They

Jan 24, 2025, 5:50:03 PM | Fast company - tech
We need to put human creativity at the center of adtech

I’ve been searching for the words to describe my feelings towards the current state of adtech. Terms like “stale,” “stagnant,” and “boring” are among the

Jan 24, 2025, 1:20:02 PM | Fast company - tech
How dangerous are 3D printers? Maybe enough for a background check

As 3D-printed gun violence abounds, some lawmakers are looking to cut the problem at the root. 

The New York state senate is currently evaluating a bill that would dramatically chan

Jan 24, 2025, 10:50:04 AM | Fast company - tech
A new Instagram feature might expose your embarrassing habits

Instagram Reels has added a new feature that shows you a feed of videos that your friends have liked. The bad news: It works both ways, meaning your friends can now see every video you’ve liked.&n

Jan 23, 2025, 9:10:04 PM | Fast company - tech